<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font size="-1">Thank you Krzysztof,<br>
<br>
Please find my responses below.<br>
<br>
</font>
<pre wrap="">>Disable one E1 - by not configuring it - as far as dahdi.conf level -
>it should pull an alarm on your telco friend so you will be sure that
>your second E1 is his "1st" or "2nd".
Ok great. I will do that.
>Yes and no. You send "block channel nr 7" and he responded "ok the 7th
>is blocked" but it does not say that CIC no. 7 is 6th or 7th or 8th
>timeslot on port one, or on port two of your asterisk box / sangoma
>card. The block does mean that you do not place new calls on this CIC
Ok. Agreed.
>You - don't. Your party - provably - has.
>If he has - the CIC no 63 that it means for me - it's some misconfiguration.
> (Two E1 could take at top - two times 30 - so 60 CIC without any
>signaling link, and at least one is a must).
Yes. I agree.
>Carefully - setup one E1 - by configuring only one, and double check
>the cables and CIC numbering.
Ok. I will call my provider again tomorrow and try what you have suggested. Hopefully we get it working! :)
Thank you for all your assistance so far.
</pre>
<br>
<font size="-1"><br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-signature">
<br>
<br>
Get important Linux and industry-related news at: <a
href="http://facebook.com/dcdata">facebook.com/dcdata</a><br>
<br>
<font color="#000000"><font face="arial" size="2">Kind regards,</font><br>
<br>
<font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font size="4">David
Wilson</font></font></font><br>
<font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font size="1">CNS,CLS,
LINUX+, CLA, DCTS, LPIC3</font></font></font><br>
<font color="#0779b5"><font face="arial"><font size="3"><b>LinuxTech
CC t/a DcData</b></font></font></font><br>
<font color="#0779b5"><font face="arial"><font size="1">CK
number: 2001/058368/23</font></font></font><br>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="75"><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2"><b>Website:</b></font></font></font></td>
<td><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.dcdata.co.za">http://www.dcdata.co.za</a></font></font></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2"><b>Support:</b></font></font></font></td>
<td><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2">+27(0)860-1-LINUX</font></font></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2"><b>Mobile:</b></font></font></font></td>
<td><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2">+27(0)824147413</font></font></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2"><b>Tel:</b></font></font></font></td>
<td><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2">+27(0)333446100</font></font></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2"><b>Fax:</b></font></font></font></td>
<td><font color="#000000"><font face="arial"><font
size="2">+27(0)866878971</font></font></font></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</font></div>
<br>
On 08/01/2012 08:26 PM, Krzysztof Drewicz wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+7dJfcCiSchY5beHFZYbVw-bsTtt+zP-yB0vy1Y3-8B8rmpxA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2012/8/1 David Wilson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dave@dcdata.co.za"><dave@dcdata.co.za></a>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
The system is in another African country so instead of me physically
pulling out the E1 cable from the system I tested by 'blocking' certain CICs
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Block is just "send some block info and wait for ack" as "send IAM"
etc. It does not concern any cabling/ logical CIC matching the
hardware.
Disable one E1 - by not configuring it - as far as dahdi.conf level -
it should pull an alarm on your telco friend so you will be sure that
your second E1 is his "1st" or "2nd".
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">in my linkset1 by using the 'ss7 block cic 1 [channel]' command. The
provider said that he could see the corresponding blocked CICs and they
appeared to match up to his CICs.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Yes and no. You send "block channel nr 7" and he responded "ok the 7th
is blocked" but it does not say that CIC no. 7 is 6th or 7th or 8th
timeslot on port one, or on port two of your asterisk box / sangoma
card. The block does mean that you do not place new calls on this CIC
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">[Aug 1 20:01:21] VERBOSE[30284] chan_dahdi.c: Resetting CIC 47
[Aug 1 20:01:21] WARNING[30284] chan_dahdi.c: RSC on unconfigured CIC 47
[Aug 1 20:01:51] VERBOSE[30284] chan_dahdi.c: Resetting CIC 63
[Aug 1 20:01:51] WARNING[30284] chan_dahdi.c: RSC on unconfigured CIC 63
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Could this possibly confirm the CIC alignment problem that we suspect? I
don't have a bchan/CIC configured for 47 or 63
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
You - don't. Your party - provably - has.
If he has - the CIC no 63 that it means for me - it's some misconfiguration.
(Two E1 could take at top - two times 30 - so 60 CIC without any
signaling link, and at least one is a must).
Carefully - setup one E1 - by configuring only one, and double check
the cables and CIC numbering.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br><br>
<p style="font-family: Verdana; font-size:8pt; color:#666666;" align="justify">
Time to evaluate your email security provider? <a href="http://www.mimecast.com/emailsecurity/">Watch the video</a> and take advantage of Mimecast’s first ever limited promotion.
</p>
</body>
</html>