<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
Hi Hassan,<br><br>Matthew developed a new channel called channel_ccs. This channels take control of the ss7 links and forward the calls trough the mgcp end points.<br><br>The fonts are in http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/team/mattf/1.6.0-chan_ccs/<br>I believe Matthew stoped this new channel development.<br><br>A 2 years ago Matthew help me to test a scenario using a Asterisk box and a Cisco 5350.<br><br>The signaling went trough a E1 connected on Asterisk and the voice path was established between the cisco using MGCP and a SIP end point and vice-versa.<br><br>We face some problems on codec negotiations, but for test purpose the solution worked very well.<br><br>We can't continued the tests because I had some time problems from my side.<br><br>Regards,<br>Bruno<br><br><br><div><hr id="stopSpelling">From: nyamul@gmail.com<br>Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:53:56 +0600<br>To: asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com<br>Subject: [asterisk-ss7] MGCP<br><br>Hi,<div><br></div><div>Looking through previous emails on this list, Matthew's post on Mar/26/2010 makes a really interesting use case for Asterisk. Does this mean, that, we can have just the *signaling E1* on the machine running Asterisk, and have all the other bearer E1s to a 3rd party access switch, say the Lucent APX8000, and have calls running from there?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Can someone please show me some help material for further reading on this?</div><div><br></div><div>Regards</div><div>HASSAN</div><div><br></div>
<br>--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-ss7 mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7</div> </div></body>
</html>