<div> </div>
<div>Hi,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I am on 1.6.1.20.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I've changed to fixed (could not find actual keyword static), with a size of 160ms, ie double the default write buffer, and so far, the quality seems fine. I'll let know the list if the write buffer issue improves, </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Regards, </div>
<div> </div>
<div>J.<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:00 AM, marek cervenka <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cervajs@fpf.slu.cz">cervajs@fpf.slu.cz</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im">
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">Hello all chan_ss7 users<br> <br>I am facing this issue as well, using chan_ss7 1.4.3 and dahdi complete 2.3.0<br>
<br>There seems to be a consensus to set the jitter buffer max size to 1000ms - I am concerned as will this induce a 1 sec delay ? Or will the<br>adaptative mode allow to optimize this ?<br> <br>Is anyone using this parameters in production ? What feedback can you give ?<br>
<br>I am a bit cautious as this is happening in prod (not test), and dont want to scr*w things up !<br></blockquote><br></div>i'm using jbimpl = static because i had problems with adaptive on asterisk 1.6.2.x<br><font color="#888888"><br>
-- <br>---------------------------------------<br>Marek Cervenka<br>=======================================</font><br>--<br>_____________________________________________________________________<br>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com/" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>asterisk-ss7 mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7</a><br></blockquote>
</div><br>