Hi Attila,<br>I tested your patch and I confirm that is working as expected. It also fixes the second behaviour (Segmentation fault) because I cannot reproduce it anymore. In fact when I'm trying to group reset on SwitchB some cics originally blocked on SwitchA these remain in their blocked state after the group reset (wich is the expected behaviour).<br>
I also tested a group reset on a mix of locally and remotely blocked cics and it's running perfectly.<br>Thank you very much Attila!<br><br>Mario<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Attila Domjan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:adomjan@tvnet.hu">adomjan@tvnet.hu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br>
<br>
1st: you are right, clearning blocking for GRS is fixed in<br>
chan_dahdi/trunk r59.<br>
<br>
the segfault: I couldn't reproduce, could you send me the gdb output of<br>
the core file?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<font color="#888888">Attila<br>
</font><div class="im"><br>
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 20:49 +0200, enrico mario wrote:<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> Hello guys,<br>
> I've got a problem with my libss7 installation (Attila version) using<br>
> "ss7 reset group" command.<br>
> I've 2 boxes, both of them with libss7, connected with a single link.<br>
> If the cics involved in the reset group command are in IDLE state<br>
> there's no problem, the GRS and GRA are succesfully processed on both<br>
> machines.<br>
><br>
> But if in the range there're some cic blocked there are two different<br>
> behaviours:<br>
> - if the machine that is sending the group reset command is the same<br>
> that has blocked the cics, these cics will assume on that machine the<br>
> IDLE state, but on the other machine the cics will remain in Remotely<br>
> Blocked state<br>
> - if the machine that is sending the group reset command is not the<br>
> one that has blocked the cics, the destination machine experience a<br>
> Segmentation Fault<br>
><br>
> Has anybody the same behaviour? I would like to modify the source<br>
> code, can you point me in the right direction?<br>
> Thank you so much<br>
><br>
> Enrico Mario<br>
</div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> _______________________________________________<br>
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com--" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com--</a><br>
><br>
> asterisk-ss7 mailing list<br>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7</a><br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com--" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com--</a><br>
<br>
asterisk-ss7 mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7</a><br></blockquote></div><br>