<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Ok,<br>
<br>
another question.<br>
They are many possibilities for echo canceller (jpah, kb1, mg2, sec2,
and sec)<br>
<br>
Wich is the best, more efficient?<br>
Is it also possible to use Oslec wich have a good reputation?<br>
<br>
Olivier<br>
<br>
<br>
Jenks, Mark a écrit :
<blockquote
cite="mid:9A560F1988F700499D7636F15A62E436A06E19@exchange02.Nsighttel.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">>From what I've seen, libss7 is for both T1's and E1's.
Chan_ss7 is only for E1's so far.
-Mark
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-----Original Message-----
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:asterisk-ss7-bounces@lists.digium.com">asterisk-ss7-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:asterisk-ss7-bounces@lists.digium.com">mailto:asterisk-ss7-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>] On Behalf Of
olivier taylor
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 3:13 PM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com">asterisk-ss7@lists.digium.com</a>
Subject: [asterisk-ss7] why
Just a question
Why libss7 and chan_SS7
where is the difference and why 2 different accesses to SS7?
Olivier
ps:For myself, I use libss7 and I am happy with it(incoming and
outgoing, thousands of calls).
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.api-digital.com">http://www.api-digital.com</a>--
asterisk-ss7 mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>