<p>Hi Antoine,</p><p>sure i would suggest the same,<br></p><p>if you budget can support it put the max of redundancy.</p><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/16/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Patrick</b> <<a href="mailto:asterisk-list@puzzled.xs4all.nl">asterisk-list@puzzled.xs4all.nl</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Antoine,<br> <br> Some comments below.<br> <br><br> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 05:43 -0700, Antoine Megalla wrote:<br> ><br> > There many unknowns to me:<br> > For example I don't know if I can put 16 E1s per server?<br>
<br> <br>Not sure. I would not stick that many E1s on a single box since Asterisk<br> can deadlock. That does not mean that it will but it can and does. In<br> this case it would bring down 480 channels. Are you willing to run that<br>
risk?<br> <br><br> > Should I put the prepaid application on the same Asterisk SS7 box, or<br> > should simply convert from SS7 to SIP on one box, and then forward the<br> > SIP call to another Asterisk box where the application is hosted?<br>
<br> <br>I would offload the prepaid application to another set of boxes for<br> scalability and redundancy.<br> <br> Regards,<br> <br>Patrick<br> <br><br> <br> _______________________________________________<br> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com--">http://www.api-digital.com--</a><br>
<br> asterisk-ss7 mailing list<br> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7</a><br> </blockquote>
</div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>--> Your next Partner !