[asterisk-ss7] RES: Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing problem with libss7

[Sverker Abrahamsson]

What is the difference of Attila's version compared to the Digitum tree?
/Sverker

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-ss7-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rafael Prado Rocchi
> Sent: den 17 mars 2011 8:54
> To: asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com
> Subject: [asterisk-ss7] RES: Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing
> problem with libss7
> 
> Hi,
> Have you tried Attila's Version?
> https://observer.router.hu/repos_pub/libss7/trunk/
> 
> We are using it in production in some companies.
> But we implemented all SS7 stuff in asterisk 1.4
> 
> 
> Asterisk 1.4
> Digium Boards
> Dahdi
> 
> It’s super stable and working fine with no errors for more than 6
> months now.
> 
> 
> Prado
> 
> 
> 
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com] Em nome de Krzysztof
> Drewicz Enviada em: quinta-feira, 17 de março de 2011 10:27
> Para: asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com
> Assunto: Re: [asterisk-ss7] Most stable SS7 Implementation WAS: facing
> problem with libss7
> 
> 2011/3/17 Jeremy Parr <jeremyparr at gmail.com>:
> 
> >
> > On that note, which flavour of SS7 driver provides the best support
> > and stability. It appears that Sangoma have their own SS7
> > implementation, as does Digium.
> 
> Well, Sangoma's libss7 does not have HA capability when you want to
> split: one Signalling Point of your * (many CICs and at least two
> signaling
> TS) on different hardware PC, so Sangoma's LIBSS7 is no good for me.
> The slides from Sangoma, look the very same as they have been
> 3 years ago.
> 
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-ss7 mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7