[asterisk-ss7] Single Point Code across Multiple * Boxes.

[Matthew Fredrickson]

Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:40:01 +0100, Attila Domjan wrote
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> Just wanted let you know the UPC-Telecom also accepted our ss7 stuff
>> (They have Ericsson AXE switches)
>>
> 
> Isn't it a good idea to make a new branch for the IP part and leave the
> changes from bug 13495 alone?
> I do use a specific revision of the branch, because i want to have the changes
> from 13495, but also having a stable revision, so if there are now additional
> changes (not IP related) i will need to patch it separately

Sorry guys, the reason why this hasn't happened is because I started 
adding the IP support, we did not have a 1.0 branch of libss7, only a 
trunk branch.  The changes both in the IP support and in Domjan's 
patches had significant API differences to the existing version of 
libss7 and its interface to chan_dahdi.

Since the IP changes are also causing fairly significant libss7 API 
changes, I decided to start work in his branch, since I do not wish to 
create a 1.2 branch of libss7, and then shortly after a 1.4 branch when 
the IP API changes are done.

Now that we have a trunk branch that is separated from the 1.0 branch of 
libss7, I will probably check the bug13495 changes (at least the libss7 
part) into that branch soon.  This branch will become 1.2 of libss7, 
when the API has stabilized.

Matthew Fredrickson
Digium, Inc.

> 
>> Regards,
>> Attila
>>
>>> You can watch the commit log for the svn branch that I'm using for it :-)
>>>
>>> I'm just trying to get to a point where I'm ready to have people start 
>>> testing with it.  As of late, I have been tied down with other projects, 
>>> but hopefully I'll get a few more minutes to work on this sometime soon.
>>>
>>> As far as status goes, I have message forwarding working between 
>>> machines now, so it should work to some level or another.  I have *not* 
>>> stress tested it or done any real production testing on it yet, so if 
>>> you wish to try it, you will have to do it realizing that there are most 
>>> likely going to be some bugs to work out.  I still have a few 
>>> outstanding issues with regards to IP link setup and teardown that I 
>>> need to get straightened out (i.e. what happens if a machine dies, etc)
>>>
>>> Matthew Fredrickson
>>> Digium, Inc.
>>>
>>>> Regards 
>>>> M.Shirazi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>>>>
>>>> asterisk-ss7 mailing list
>>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>>>
>>> asterisk-ss7 mailing list
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> asterisk-ss7 mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7