[asterisk-ss7] why

[Matthew Fredrickson]

olivier taylor wrote:
> Ok,
> 
> another question.
> They are many possibilities for echo canceller (jpah, kb1, mg2, sec2, 
> and sec)
> 
> Wich is the best, more efficient?

MG2 is the current "state of the art" so if in doubt, that is the 
echocanceller which has been used by default for a while and yo should 
probably pick that one.

> Is it also possible to use Oslec wich have a good reputation?

Not sure...


Matthew Fredrickson
Digium, Inc.

> 
> Olivier
> 
> 
> Jenks, Mark a écrit :
>> >From what I've seen, libss7 is for both T1's and E1's.
>>
>> Chan_ss7 is only for E1's so far.
>>
>> -Mark 
>>
>>   
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com 
>>> [mailto:asterisk-ss7-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of 
>>> olivier taylor
>>> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 3:13 PM
>>> To: asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com
>>> Subject: [asterisk-ss7] why
>>>
>>> Just a question
>>>
>>> Why libss7 and chan_SS7
>>>
>>> where is the difference and why 2 different accesses to SS7?
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>> ps:For myself, I use libss7 and I am happy with it(incoming and 
>>> outgoing, thousands of calls).
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>>>
>>> asterisk-ss7 mailing list
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7
>>>
>>>     
>>
>>   
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> asterisk-ss7 mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7