[asterisk-ss7] Loadsharing with libss7

[Domjan Attila]

Hi,
thanks, today I have an interconnection (Lucent switch) and seems
everything ok, only need implement generic notification indication in
CPG (the switch use it instead of SUS/RES), I fixed the mtp3 restart
missimplementation. We will have another interconnection, the another
telco has STPs the current not, so the STP related stuff not tested yet
with switch (inhibit, TFP).
I will do some more tests tomorrow and I think after it should merging
the patches.

Regards,
Attila
 
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 11:42 +0500, Anton wrote:
> Hey Domjan,
> 
> Your patches great, I'm already using them on one of my live 
> servers. I've noticed one issue with them in the tests, but 
> it's not too critical.
> 
> Regards,
> Anton.
> 
> On Tuesday 18 November 2008 01:32, Domjan Attila wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I hope tomorrow will be fixed my leased lines and this
> > week we will finish the interconnection tests and you can
> > inspect my patches.
> >
> > Rgards,
> > Attila
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:02 -0600, Matthew Fredrickson 
> wrote:
> > > Tobias Wolf wrote:
> > > > Matthew Fredrickson schrieb:
> > > >> Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> > > >>> Tobias Wolf <tobias.wolf at evision.de> writes:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I believe you can do this with chan_ss7, setting up
> > > >>> two boxes as a cluster, though I think you would
> > > >>> set up both boxes with the same point code. This is
> > > >>> important not only to get load sharing but also to
> > > >>> be able to do system maintenance without downtime,
> > > >>> and is a standard in the MPT3 part of SS7.
> > > >
> > > > I have not checked chan_ss7 yet, because libss7 works
> > > > very well for us. but maybe it is worth a look ;)
> > > >
> > > >> That is correct.  At this time, we don't have the
> > > >> ability to share a single point code between
> > > >> multiple machines.
> > > >>
> > > >>> possible to do it using two different point codes
> > > >>> as you describe with some help from the switch at
> > > >>> the other end?
> > > >>
> > > >> That's the way I would advise doing it for the time
> > > >> being...
> > > >
> > > > I have checked with the owner of the ss7 switch and
> > > > it supports this.
> > > >
> > > > any idea when sharing a point code between two (or
> > > > more?) asterisk server will be possible. is this on
> > > > any roadmap, yet ?
> > >
> > > Besides getting everything ready so that we pass all
> > > interconnection tests, it is the next highest priority.
> > >
> > > Matthew Fredrickson
> > > Digium, Inc.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
> > > http://www.api-digital.com--
> > >
> > > asterisk-ss7 mailing list
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >   
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-ss7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-ss7/attachments/20081120/29edc01d/attachment.pgp