[hydra-dev] Project Hydra update

[Malcolm C. Davenport]

Howdy,

Last call for additional feedback.

Anyone?

Cheers


----- Original Message -----
> On 06/02/2010 06:23 PM, Leif Madsen wrote:
> > When I read through this it all seemed to make sense to me. I think
> > the interpretation of the API boundaries is a fair one. Has there
> > been any talk with other parties (like groklaw or FSF and the like?)
> > to determine if the interpretation being presented for the API
> > boundaries holds water?
> 
> There's really no need; the GPLv2 is an agreement between two parties,
> and those parties can choose to interpret the terms of the agreement
> any way they wish. If the parties' interpretations differ
> significantly, and
> the disagreement ends up being decided by a third party, then that
> third party may provide an alternate interpretation, but that's about
> as far
> as it could go.
> 
> My personal opinion is that the FSF would likely fully endorse this
> interpretation, as it extends the purpose and spirit of the GPLv2 to
> accommodate 'modern' application development methods and frameworks.
> 
> -- Kevin P. Fleming
> Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
> skype: kpfleming | jabber: kfleming at digium.com
> Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
> 
> _______________________________________________ Project Hydra
> Development Discussion List
> NOTE: All content you receive from this list is should be treated as
> confidential.
> 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/hydra-dev

-- 
--------------------------------------------------
Malcolm Davenport
Digium, Inc. | Senior Product Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Tel: +1 256 428 6252
Fax: +1 256 864 0464
malcolmd at digium.com