Hi Melcon,<br><br>I was reading things too quick today and I don't noticed that was a Telco, not a PBX ;)<br><br>Asterisk <a href="http://1.4.22.0">1.4.22.0</a> renamed chan_zap.so to chan_dahdi.so, but it have the two behaviors<br>
<br>Dial(Zap/....)<br>Dial(DAHDI/....)<br><br>That's all<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Melcon Moraes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:melcon@gmail.com">melcon@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Also, as stated by him, his E1 is connect to the TELCO, not to a legacy pbx.<br>
<br>
I was wondering, and you guys might shed on light on it, does it<br>
matter having asterisk 1.4.22 with chan_dahdi without dahdi? As far as<br>
I can tell, he's using zaptel to talk to the hardware. I'm not<br>
familiar with 1.4 at all, specially when it comes to changing<br>
zaptel/chan_zap to dahdi/chan_dahdi.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
- MM<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br></div></div></blockquote></div>-- <br>Alexandre C Alencar (Skarmeth)<br><a href="http://blog.alexandrealencar.net/">http://blog.alexandrealencar.net/</a><br><a href="http://www.alexandrealencar.net/">http://www.alexandrealencar.net/</a><br>
<a href="http://people.debian-ce.org/skarmeth/">http://people.debian-ce.org/skarmeth/</a><br><br>