I'm thinking of replacing 'dahdi_scan > ' with 'mydahdi_scan > ' in config/js/index.js . mydahdi_scan would be a script that would ouput the 'faked' dahdi_scan data. I don't know what parts of the output I need to fake to get my setup working with the Asterisk GUI. I guess I want to fake a TDM card?? This is the dahdi_scan output from my installed card:<div>
<br></div><div>active=yes<div>alarms=OK</div><div>description=Wildcard TE121 Card 0</div><div>name=WCT1/0</div><div>manufacturer=Digium</div><div>devicetype=Wildcard TE121 with VPMADT032</div><div>location=PCI Bus 04 Slot 09</div>
<div>basechan=1</div><div>totchans=24</div><div>irq=16</div><div>type=digital-T1</div><div>syncsrc=1</div><div>lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)</div><div>coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI</div><div>framing_opts=ESF,D4</div><div>coding=B8ZS</div>
<div>framing=ESF</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:44 PM, marvin horst <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marvin.horst@pbzinc.com">marvin.horst@pbzinc.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Yes, that's what I'd like to do, manually edit the conf file and then fake dahdi_scan. How do I go about faking dahdi_scan???<div>
<br></div><div>The reason I was missing Span 2 was that I'm actually working in my backup server which has a TE121B card which only has one T1 span.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com" target="_blank">tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 02:28:12PM -0500, marvin horst wrote:<br>
> Does the Asterisk GUI use dahdi_genconf to determine it's hardware setup? So<br>
> all I have to do is get dahdi_genconf to spit out the proper hardware config<br>
> for my 'unique' setup and I'm good to go?<br>
<br>
</div>No, it can't really figure that out.<br>
<br>
But let's look at something different:<br>
<br>
if you already have FXS and FXO channels, why should the GUI care how<br>
they were created?<br>
<br>
The ugly way to trick the GUI: fake the output of dahdi_scan as if you<br>
have analog channels. From this point on it wouldn't really care.<br>
<div><br></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Marvin Horst<br>IT Manager<br>Paul B Zimmerman Inc<br>(717) 738-7365 x824<br>
</div></div>