[asterisk-gui] Bandwidth.com extensions

Trevor Benson tbenson at a-1networks.com
Wed Jun 11 23:08:32 CDT 2008


Here it is.

newvoip*CLI> dialplan show DID_trunk_2
[ Context 'DID_trunk_2' created by 'pbx_config' ]
  's' =>            1. ExecIf($[ "${CALLERID(num)}"="" ]|SetCallerPres|unavailable) [pbx_config]
                    2. ExecIf($[ "${CALLERID(num)}"="" ]|Set|CALLERID(all)=unknown <0000000>) [pbx_config]
                    3. Goto(default|900|1)                        [pbx_config]
  '_+17077039999' => 1. Goto(default|900|1)                        [pbx_config]
  '_X.' =>          1. Goto(default|900|1)                        [pbx_config]
  Include =>        'default'                                     [pbx_config]

-= 3 extensions (5 priorities) in 1 context. =-
newvoip*CLI>

I don't think I need the _ in the extension since it's a full number, but don't think it will hurt either.  I set it to answer the exact extension, any number, and a few other variations that always gave the same error no matter what I set it to.  At that point I figured it's not matching the context. Since Bandwidth.com does not use registration that is causing a context mismatch when the call comes in, thus no extension match?

Thanks,
Trevor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-gui-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-gui-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Kruse
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:10 PM
> To: Asterisk GUI project discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-gui] Bandwidth.com extensions
> 
> Do a dialplan show context-name and see if you see that number.
> 
> -brandon
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Trevor Benson" <tbenson at a-1networks.com>
> To: "Asterisk GUI project discussion" <asterisk-gui at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:54:45 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: [asterisk-gui] Bandwidth.com extensions
> 
> Seem to be having an issue with creating a rule that actually routes
> traffic into the system.  I added a all unmatched rule for
> bandwidth.com and the +17077039999 (lets say, as last 4 digits are
> obfuscated). In either case the system returns:
> 
> [Jun 11 14:51:10] NOTICE[12869]: chan_sip.c:13952
> handle_request_invite: Call from '' to extension '+17077039999'
> rejected because extension not found.
> 
> Is there something wrong with trying to load bandwidth.com for inbound
> rules?  I augmented the system a little by hand to resolve answering
> (matched my old 1.2 system) still seems to want to ignore the request.
> 
> Thanks,
> Trevor
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> asterisk-gui mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui
> 
> --
> ******************************
> Brandon Kruse
> Software Technician
> Digium, Inc.
> 150 West Park Loop, Suite 100
> Huntsville, AL 35806
> Phone: +1-256-428-6115
> 877.546.8963
> 877.linux.me!
> www.digium.com
> www.asterisk.org
> ******************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> asterisk-gui mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui



More information about the asterisk-gui mailing list