[asterisk-gui] Ball dropped on zapscan/ztscan

[bkruse]

Absolutely no problem.

Wish I could have migrated it over in a better way, but I was in a time
crunch :]

No worries,

-Brandon


Seadya Badihi wrote:
> Thank you very much for the comprehensive explanation, and apologies for the way I expressed my concern.
>   
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Brandon Kruse" <bkruse at digium.com>
>> To: "Asterisk GUI project discussion" <asterisk-gui at lists.digium.com>
>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-gui] Ball dropped on zapscan/ztscan
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:35:40 -0600 (CST)
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Before making such remarks, do your research.
>>
>> Ztscan has been revamped completely, and works great with both
>> analog and digital cards.
>>
>> Using the LATEST ZAPTEL.
>>
>> If you are not fimilar with svn, let me give you a quick rundown.
>>
>> Zaptel has a 1.4 branch (which would be the "latest zaptel" that is acceptable
>> to use in a production environment)
>>
>> The 1.4.7 tag does not have it because it was before it was moved into zaptel.
>>
>> (the 1.4.7.1 tag was made specifically for a driver release, 
>> therefore was not included)
>>
>> http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel/branches/1.4/ztscan.c?view=log
>>
>> ^^There is ztscan.
>>
>> Essentially, the next release (1.4.8?) will have ztscan in it.
>>
>> Here, I will make it simple for you: (as root, copy/paste)
>> svn co http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/1.4 zaptel-1.4; cd 
>> zaptel-1.4; sh configure && make
>> && make install ; clear; echo "wow, you have ztscan now"
>>
>> I will personally see to it that you get your svn subscription fees 
>> returned to you.
>>
>> ztscan was developed for Business Edition, so all this is setup for 
>> you. We assume that
>> when we say latest zaptel it means branches/1.4. I will try to 
>> clarify that in the future.
>>
>> Next time, try phrasing the question "Where did ztscan go?" and 
>> your problem, and I will happily assist.
>>
>> We did this for the overall GUI and framework before a big release, 
>> as it is the proper way to do it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -bk
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Seadya Badihi" <badihi at mail.com>
>> To: asterisk-gui at lists.digium.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2008 1:08:29 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
>> Subject: [asterisk-gui] Ball dropped on zapscan/ztscan
>>
>> I suppose that the intension was to move the tools previously 
>> included in the tools directory of Asterisk-gui to Zaptel package.
>> This has not happened. If you install a new Asterisk using the 
>> latest Zaptel 1.4.7.1 and the current Asterisk-gui, your hardware 
>> will not be detected as it will be missing zapscan/ztscan.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Are we headed for a recession? Read more on the Money Portal
>> Mail.com Money - http://www.mail.com/Money.aspx?cat=money
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>>
>> asterisk-gui mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>     http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>>
>> asterisk-gui mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>     http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui
>>     
>
>   
>
>
>