[asterisk-gui] Service Providers and Incoming Calling Rules

[Pari Nannapaneni]

> _+17077731234 or +17077731234 they both say unmatched extensions.  I 

Try another rule with _17077731234 , see if it works.

-Pari

-- 
Pari Nannapaneni
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer.
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org



----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Benson" <tbenson at a-1networks.com>
To: "Asterisk GUI project discussion" <asterisk-gui at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 12:16:47 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [asterisk-gui] Service Providers and Incoming Calling Rules

Does anyone using GUI 2.x have bandwidth.com routing properly into their 
system?  I created a blanket rule that all unmatched extensions will go 
to which matches and then gets answered, but no matter if I use 
_+17077731234 or +17077731234 they both say unmatched extensions.  I 
have removed the service provider and rules, and replaced them. 

Can someone who has the extension actually matching correctly show me 
their service provider edit page (no user and password so shouldn't be a 
security issue) and the inbound calling rule (preferably as it shows in 
the GUI and an output of how it shows from extensions.conf.


Either its a pattern match issue with the + involved, or there is some 
context inheritance issue, is about all i can figure at this point.  I 
would really appreciate any response from someone who knows their 
dialplans with BW.com is working.

Thank you,
Trevor Benson
A1 Networks

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-gui mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui