[asterisk-gui] Should the GUI write to actual config files?

Thu Apr 5 09:27:14 MST 2007

Hi Brandon,
I once used the Advanced option on the GUI to configure sip.conf and
what I noticed was that the GUI added the options available there (blank
or not) to the end of sip.conf. As I had installed the sample sip.conf
it was a bit messy (visually speaking :-) ).
My opinion would be to replace all configuration files (the ones that
are installed with make samples) with simpler ones, without all those
examples and comments but with the basic functionality.

Alex

Brandon Kruse escreveu:
> Hey guys, brandon again.
>
>
> I was wondering about what your experiences/ideas are
> about the GUI and writing to config files.
>
> Ever written things by hand and had them erased?
>
> You think we should have like configname.gui.conf and
> then include that in configname.conf (especially for
> extensions.conf if nothing else)
>
>
> Lets hear your thoughts......
>
> -bkruse
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-gui mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-gui/attachments/20070405/d68bb21b/signature.pgp