<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2020-10-06 2:22 PM, Joshua C. Colp
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAM0A2Z2eBt_K1CyGiOC51+jUQB+wJ5RDopop8-OWu-Z=O0AaxQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:18 PM Jared Smith <<a
href="mailto:jaredsmith@jaredsmith.net"
moz-do-not-send="true">jaredsmith@jaredsmith.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:50 AM Dan Jenkins
<<a href="mailto:dan@nimblea.pe" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">dan@nimblea.pe</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">sorry, I thought I was agreeing with
you :) we need to engage package maintainers to
potentially help ease the shift - if packages are a
thing.... but as far as I'm concerned most package
managers have out of date versions of Asterisk, or
don't have things you want so you end up building
from source anyway</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I actively package Asterisk for Fedora and EPEL
(CentOS/RHEL), and I work hard to package the latest
versions as they are released. I'm always open to
additional input on how to make my packages more
relevant for consumers -- either by packaging
additional modules, or by having better sub-packages.
For example, my packages already have chan_sip and
pjsip split off as separate subpackages.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As a packager and someone who has been in the community
and user world, what's your opinion and thoughts on the 2
year strategy? <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hello,<br>
<br>
For us we have debian packages we maintain. We follow the latest
stable version with a test suite and a bot make the package. So 2
years it's clearly not an issue. About chan_sip we completely
removed it.<br>
<br>
Sylvain<br>
</body>
</html>