<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Le 06/09/2018 à 16:18, Matthew Jordan a écrit :<br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAN2PU+5m2bxth+os644FThd3YPWDY41-3VsYhHncoORwdi6N=A@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div dir="ltr"><br>
            <br>
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <div dir="ltr">On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:23 PM Seán C.
                McCord <<a href="mailto:ulexus@gmail.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">ulexus@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                <div dir="ltr">As to the events should have a
                  deterministic order or not, I cannot speak, but this
                  is definitely normal behaviour.
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <br>
                <div class="gmail_quote">
                  <div dir="ltr">On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:22 PM Jean
                    Aunis <<a href="mailto:jean.aunis@prescom.fr"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">jean.aunis@prescom.fr</a>>
                    wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                    0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                    rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                    <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                      <p>Hello,</p>
                      <p>It looks like the ARI events ordering during
                        channel destruction is not deterministic. I
                        noticed this for ChannelLeftBridge and
                        ChannelDestroyed events : given a channel is in
                        a bridge and is hanged up, sometimes
                        ChannelLeftBridge is raised before
                        ChannelDestroyed, sometimes it's the contrary.
                        Test conditions are exactly the same in both
                        cases.<br>
                      </p>
                      <p>Is this non-deterministic behaviour normal, or
                        should it be considered as a bug ?</p>
                      <p>To my mind, ChannelDestroyed should always be
                        the very last event raised for a given channel.
                        From a developper point of view, it would give a
                        clear indication that the resources associated
                        to the channel can be freed.</p>
                      <p>Regards<br clear="all">
                      </p>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div>The events regarding a Channel entering and leaving a
                Bridge are deterministic with respect to the Bridge's
                lifetime, but are not deterministic with respect to the
                Channel's lifetime. While it's a bit different, this is
                discussed somewhat on the AMI specification page:</div>
              <tt><snip></tt><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    Thanks for the answer, I understand the problem. I'll live with it.<br>
    <br>
    Regards<br>
    <br>
    Jean<br>
  </body>
</html>