<html>
<body>
<div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
<table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="8" style="border: 1px #c9c399 solid;">
<tr>
<td>
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
<a href="https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3603/">https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3603/</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Was the behavior for this ever brought up on the -dev list? I don't remember it so I don't think so. Before accepting the behavior you've done I'd really like us to talk about it there amongst everyone. I really think it's the reverse of what a user would expect to happen when a masquerade happens.</pre>
<br />
<p>- Joshua Colp</p>
<br />
<p>On October 31st, 2014, 12:06 a.m. UTC, Corey Farrell wrote:</p>
<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" style="background-image: url('https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/static/rb/images/review_request_box_top_bg.ab6f3b1072c9.png'); background-position: left top; background-repeat: repeat-x; border: 1px black solid;">
<tr>
<td>
<div>Review request for Asterisk Developers, Joshua Colp and Matt Jordan.</div>
<div>By Corey Farrell.</div>
<p style="color: grey;"><i>Updated Oct. 31, 2014, 12:06 a.m.</i></p>
<div style="margin-top: 1.5em;">
<b style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Bugs: </b>
<a href="https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-22409">ASTERISK-22409</a>
</div>
<div style="margin-top: 1.5em;">
<b style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt;">Repository: </b>
Asterisk
</div>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">During masquerade it is possible for the AST_JITTERBUFFER_FD to be cleared (set to -1). This change adds a check when copying channel fd's to prevent clearing an FD with -1. This seems to resolve the bad audio quality experienced after the masquerade. When AST_JITTERBUFFER_FD was set to -1, this prevented the channel from polling that timer. This caused RTP packets to be received late, and discarded.</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Testing </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Verified the scenario outlined in ASTERISK-22409 no longer experiences audio quality loss.</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> </h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">
<li>/branches/11/main/channel.c <span style="color: grey">(426593)</span></li>
<li>/branches/11/funcs/func_jitterbuffer.c <span style="color: grey">(426593)</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3603/diff/" style="margin-left: 3em;">View Diff</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>