<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>7 jan 2013 kl. 21:04 skrev "David Lee" <<a href="mailto:reviewboard@asterisk.org">reviewboard@asterisk.org</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><pre style="font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); margin: 0px; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word; ">In addition to swapping the names of the channels, also swap their
uniqueid's. This allows the 'Uniqueid' field to be used as a stable
identifier for a channel from and external interface, such as AMI.</pre></blockquote></div><br><div>This will break a lot of existing 3rd party software that has managed to work around the insane</div><div>amount of messages and stuff that happens during the masq. I agree we need to make it</div><div>simple but after changing AMI a while ago I also see what kind of feedback you will get</div><div>if you change this.</div><div><br></div><div>I agree it's the right way forward, but you might want to make it optional.</div><div><br></div><div>/O</div></body></html>