On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Matthew Jordan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mjordan@digium.com" target="_blank">mjordan@digium.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
It is certainly not impossible, but I really don't think this is a point<br>
to trivialize. Beyond the difficulty involved, there is a certain<br>
amount of object management and translation that such a façade would<br>
have to provide that would not be required from a C SIP stack. This<br>
does increase the technical burden - and the time involved in making<br>
said stack usable in Asterisk.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It's not required with a C++ stack, either. I think a writing a C wrapper would be crazy and the channel driver should just be C++ if resiprocate were to be used.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Personally, C++ would not prevent me from contributing. How much it would hinder the community ... I don't know. It's not something easy to go measure. However, it's not like C++ is some new crazy thing that only a few people know. I don't see any problem with it ...</div>
<div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Russell Bryant </div></div></div>