On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:saghul@gmail.com" target="_blank">saghul@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
As Joshua has said earlier, PJSIP is project that is kind of meant to be embedded in applications. The build system only provides static libraries and if you need changes to the library deep down, you need to modify PJSIP itself in a way it may not really benefit anyone.<br>
</blockquote><div> </div><div>I understand that's how pjsip is currently designed and built. The problem is that it *sucks*. Hopefully we don't need to argue through all the reasons why bundling code is a terrible idea.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Given the amount of work involved in building a new channel driver, if pjsip was used, putting some effort into making pjsip suck less in being a proper library seems worthwhile.</div><div><br></div><div>
-- </div><div>Russell Bryant</div></div></div>