<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt">Olle<br />
<br />
If it is stable what is the objection to letting it go through. The premise behind it appears to be sound and would enhance the responsiveness of the queue system. <br />
<br />
<div>Thanks<br />
<br />
Bryant Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.)<br />
616-855-1030 Ext. 2003</div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><hr width="100%" size="2" align="center" />
<b>From</b>: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net><br />
<b>Sent</b>: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:26 AM<br />
<b>To</b>: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com><br />
<b>Subject</b>: [asterisk-dev] Pinequeue - to hold or not to hold</span><br />
<br />
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1887/<br />
<br />
Leif strongly wants to put this on hold, I think it is a great addition as it is and don't think his claim is valid.<br />
<br />
I need some consensus on what to do. If the dev team wants to put this on hold, fine, then I won't spend any time on fixing the code according to the rest of the review feedback. If the dev team wants this feature, I will continue to work on it towards a merge into the source code.<br />
<br />
I need a decision so I can either continue or close the review, I don't want to have another review that stays out there without feedback for ages, as I actually have pretty good feedback to work on.<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
/O<br />
--<br />
_____________________________________________________________________<br />
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --<br />
<br />
asterisk-dev mailing list<br />
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br />
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev<br />
<br /></span>