<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Steve Davies <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:davies147@gmail.com">davies147@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I appreciate that CEL is probably the preferred call logging mechanism<br>
these days, but I've found a couple of CDR issues, originally in 1.6.2<br>
that still apply through 1.8.x and 10.x.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-17826" target="_blank">https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-17826</a> was already<br>
open against 1.6.2, but I've just updated it for v.10<br>
<br>
<a href="https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19164" target="_blank">https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19164</a> is new as I<br>
discovered it while researching #17826.<br>
<br>
Feedback welcomed please.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Steve<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br>I've found the CDR records to be buggy when transferring. Basic inbound/outbound calls are accounted for correctly. At the very least I would like to see transfers fixed, which is most likely the same issue for AMI redirects.<br>
<br><a href="https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18733">https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18733</a><br><br>Having to parse CEL to produce my own CDR records seems like an extra step. If CEL was added so I can parse the records correctly why can't Asterisk? I know everyone has disagreements on how CDR records should be accounted for, but I don't think CDR data should be just left out.<br>
<br>Ryan<br></div></div><br>