<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt">Does version 10.0 beta suffer from the same issues and will it have a patch to add storesipcause?<br />
I have one 10.0 beta box up but I have no idea how to test to see if the same issue occurs.<br />
<br />
<div id="divSignature">Thanks<br />
<br />
Bryant Zimmerman</div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><hr align="center" size="2" width="100%" />
<b>From</b>: "Alistair Cunningham" <acunningham@integrics.com><br />
<b>Sent</b>: Saturday, August 27, 2011 9:43 PM<br />
<b>To</b>: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com><br />
<b>Subject</b>: Re: [asterisk-dev] 1.6 vs. 1.8</span><br />
<br />
On 28/08/11 11:06, Nick Khamis wrote:<br />
> Thank you very much Alistair. My next question would be, how far are<br />
> we with 1.8? Are we getting close to ironing out deadlocks etc..?<br />
<br />
If a patch for multiple simultaneous call pickups to a local channel is <br />
included in 1.8.7.0, and the storesipcause configuration change solves <br />
the "deadlock-like" problems (we haven't had an opportunity to test this <br />
under heavy load yet), then all the 1.8.X issues we're aware of at this <br />
time will be resolved.<br />
<br />
Alistair Cunningham<br />
+1 888 468 3111<br />
+44 20 799 39 799<br />
http://integrics.com/<br />
<br />
--<br />
_____________________________________________________________________<br />
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --<br />
<br />
asterisk-dev mailing list<br />
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br />
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev<br />
<br /></span>