<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Russell Bryant <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:russell@digium.com">russell@digium.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
> Am 10.11.10 12:36, schrieb Steve Davies:<br>
><br>
> >> <a href="https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18165" target="_blank">https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18165</a><br>
> >><br>
> >> Antonio.<br>
> ><br>
> > This issue has now been closed/fixed, but the patch was only applied<br>
> > to the 1.4 branch<br>
> ><br>
> > I have a candidate patch for 1.6.2.13 - Should the issue be<br>
> > re-opened<br>
> > for me to attach the patch, or should I open a related issue for<br>
> > 1.6.2<br>
> > and onwards?<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks,<br>
> > Steve<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> Hello Steve,<br>
><br>
> Please open a new issue and i will relate it to the above one and will<br>
> take a look at your patch.<br>
<br>
</div>That would be good, but check with Jeff first. He's probably in the middle of porting it to 1.6.2 and 1.8.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, I am still testing 1.6.2 as the changes did not trivially apply. The changes there and for the other branches will be committed soon.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Jeff</div></div>