<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/7/9 Kevin P. Fleming <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kpfleming@digium.com">kpfleming@digium.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On 07/09/2010 08:39 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:<br>
> IMO it should be handled identical to SIP 3xx redirects<br>
><br>
> regards<br>
> Klaus<br>
><br>
> Am 09.07.2010 14:40, schrieb Wolfgang Pichler:<br>
>> Hi all,<br>
>><br>
>> for a project i do need the call rerouting feature implemented in dahdi<br>
>> - so that chan_dahdi is not only able to send call deflection message -<br>
>> it should also be able to handle them.<br>
>><br>
>> I do have already discussed this with some other people - i have seen<br>
>> that it is already implemented in bristuff - so porting that part to the<br>
>> current libpri/dahdi version would be an idea (bristuff does generate a<br>
>> new local channel when it receives the call deflection message).<br>
>><br>
>> But libpri / chan_dahdi nowadays does already have most of the needed<br>
>> functions already implemented - so it could be to be easier to make a<br>
>> new implementation based on the current source.<br>
>><br>
>> What do you think would be better - porting the bristuff parts - or<br>
>> reimplemting it ?<br>
>><br>
>> The other question is - if it will get reimplemented - how to handle the<br>
>> rerouting / deflection ?<br>
>><br>
>> - Creating a local channel to handle it<br>
>> - Hangup the call leg were you got the call deflection with a new hangup<br>
>> cause - and store the redirection number in a channel var of the source<br>
>> channel<br>
>> - Handle it like a transfer - if the t option is given in the dialstring<br>
>> - then jump into the transfer context - and go on there<br>
>><br>
>> What do you think about this ?<br>
>><br>
>> best regards,<br>
>> Wolfgang<br>
<br>
</div></div>Asterisk SVN trunk (which will become 1.8 shortly) already supports Call<br>
Deflection.<br>
<br></blockquote><div>perfect - backport to 1.6 would be hard or not ?</div><div>How does 1.8 handle call deflection ?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
--<br>
Kevin P. Fleming<br>
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies<br>
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA<br>
skype: kpfleming | jabber: <a href="mailto:kfleming@digium.com">kfleming@digium.com</a><br>
Check us out at <a href="http://www.digium.com" target="_blank">www.digium.com</a> & <a href="http://www.asterisk.org" target="_blank">www.asterisk.org</a><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
_____________________________________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
asterisk-dev mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>