<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:55 AM, François Delawarde <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fdelawarde@wirelessmundi.com">fdelawarde@wirelessmundi.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 10:54 -0400, Leif Madsen wrote:<br>
> The karma system wouldn't factor into how the Digium team performs<br>
> development<br>
> because the issues that could potentially affect the greatest number<br>
> of people<br>
> are worked on first; regardless as to who originally filed the issue.<br>
> That's a<br>
> good thing because if someone new comes along and files a good report,<br>
> and that<br>
> report is about something that affects a large number of users, it<br>
> doesn't make<br>
> sense to sit on it just because their karma isn't as high as someone<br>
> else :)<br>
<br>
</div>Not necessarily if you priorize in that way:<br>
1. urgency / whether it affects lots of users<br>
2. report quality<br>
3. whether it is trivial<br>
4. whether it includes a patch<br>
5. karma of the reporter<br>
<br>
It would just mean that between that a bug having a good report AND a<br>
trusted reporter would be treated faster than a bug having just a good<br>
report. Higher karma usually meaning less resources necessary and faster<br>
resolution.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
François.<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>#1. Beneficial to Digium's Switchvox product and sales.<br></div></div>