<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18865"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Now in trunk we have
ISDN subaddress support.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
Using a dial format along the lines of DIAL(dahdi/g0/5555678:5678) where 5555678
is the main number of the remote site, and 5678 is the extension (device) at the
remote site.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
You can set your subaddress before calling with function
CALLERID(subaddr).</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>The issue is with
the CDR, we currently record the 'src' and the 'dst' and I'm proposing the
'dnid' as well, but all these fields are missing the
subaddress.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>DNID proposal <A
href="https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/455/">https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/455/</A></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>If a subaddress was
present for a field I'm suggesting</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
'clid' would then look like "CALLER NAME" <5551234:1234> instead
of "CALLER NAME" <5551234></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
'src' would then look like 5551234:1234 instead of
5551234</FONT></SPAN></DIV></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010> <FONT size=2
face=Arial>proposed 'dnid' would look
like 5555678:5678</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
'dst' would then look like 5555678:5678 instead of
5555678</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010>T</SPAN></FONT></SPAN><SPAN
class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>he question
is.</FONT></SPAN></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
Do we add a new field for calling and called subaddresses, or do we
modify existing fields as suggested above?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>After seeing how
easy adding the 'dnid' field was, I'm actually in favour of adding fields, then
if the underlying database has the corresonding field it will be
populated, with mysql any way.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Alec
Davis</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=202525708-07012010><FONT size=2
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV></BODY></HTML>