<div>
<div> </div>
<div>I have successfully built SecureRTP trunk, with patch</div>
<div> <a href="http://bugs.digium.com/file_download.php?file_id=10773&type=bug">http://bugs.digium.com/file_download.php?file_id=10773&type=bug</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>however, when I getting asterisk up, the module res_srtp.so can not find SRTP symbol srtp_init!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I should have install libSRTP 1.4.2 properly, how to make the dynamic module of asterisk find static libsrtp.a?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks.</div>
<div>Levin</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Platform is trixbox 1.2.0, gcc 3.4.6, kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp </div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Message: 3<br>Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:51:20 +0200<br>From: Tzafrir Cohen <<a href="mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com">
tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] Build of Asterisk SecureRTP trunk Fail at<br> ./configure<br>To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <<a href="mailto:asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com">asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com
</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20061204095120.GD7598@xorcom.com">20061204095120.GD7598@xorcom.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br><br>On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:39:41PM +0800, levin lee wrote:
<br>> Hi,<br>> I have try to build SRTP Asterisk for a while, but fail without hint<br>> anything<br>> The tail of running ./configure is as follow<br>><br>> checking for strcasestr... yes<br>> checking for asprintf... yes
<br>> checking for vasprintf... yes<br>> checking for compiler atomic operations... no<br>> configure: creating ./config.status<br>> configure: error: could not make ./config.status<br>> make: *** [config.status
] Error 1<br>><br>> Anybody can help or give some tips?<br><br>No sure. But due to lack of good suggestions, I'd give you the sanity<br>checks:<br><br>* is the directory writable?<br>* Does 'touch config.status' work?
<br>* Any chance you're out of free disk space? df .<br><br>Also: what platform is it? E.g: what linux distro? Any special build<br>system modifications?<br><br>--<br> Tzafrir Cohen<br>icq#16849755
<a href="mailto:jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org">jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org</a><br>+972-50-7952406 mailto:<a href="mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com">tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com</a><br><a href="http://www.xorcom.com">http://www.xorcom.com
</a> <a href="http://iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir">iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir</a><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 4<br>Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:41:13 +0000<br>From: Tim Panton <
<a href="mailto:tim@mexuar.com">tim@mexuar.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] extend IAX2 IE proposal<br>To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <<a href="mailto:asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com">asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com
</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1CBD004E-BAAD-48C9-ADB6-72B73FC9CD43@mexuar.com">1CBD004E-BAAD-48C9-ADB6-72B73FC9CD43@mexuar.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed<br>
<br><br>On 4 Dec 2006, at 04:11, Russell Bryant wrote:<br><br>> Tilghman Lesher wrote:<br>>> On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:51, Tim Panton wrote:<br>>>> But Kevin's point still applies, IAX doesn't support multiple
<br>>>> instances of<br>>>> the same IE type in a message.<br>>> Is that by spec or by implementation? If by spec, then my IAX2 vars<br>>> implementation was a big "Oops" on my part.
<br>><br>> That's a good question. I can't think of any good reason for this<br>> to be the case. It seems like being able to have more than one IE<br>> in a message could be quite useful.<br><br>It is just that all the element definitions in the RFC so far are
<br>_unique_ values which<br>have no sensible meaning for multiple values, like SAMPLINGRATE,<br>DATETIME etc.<br><br>It doesn't say multiple values of the same type are permitted or not,<br>so I guess they<br>are. If I remember right the current asterisk implementation just
<br>uses the last value it<br>finds for a given type.<br><br>Tim.<br><br>Tim Panton<br><br><a href="http://www.mexuar.net">www.mexuar.net</a><br><a href="http://www.westhawk.co.uk/">www.westhawk.co.uk/</a><br><br><br><br>
<br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 5<br>Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:48:30 +0100<br>From: Tristan <<a href="mailto:tristan@telemaque.fr">tristan@telemaque.fr</a>><br>Subject: [asterisk-dev] Local Channel failure
<br>To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <<a href="mailto:asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com">asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:45740B0E.9050702@telemaque.fr">45740B0E.9050702@telemaque.fr
</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>Hi Friends,<br><br>Just a little mail because i get sometimes this sort or error:<br><br>2006-12-04 12:42:09 WARNING[6107]: channel.c:1360 ast_hangup: Hard
<br>hangup called by thread 1084123456 on<br>Local/7922@call_agents-4868,1<ZOMBIE>, while fd is blocked by thread<br>1084123456 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds! Expect a failure<br><br>Where Local/XXXX@call_agents is called by app_queue.
<br><br>Agents are logged via a local channel and gets called back by this<br>dialplan context.<br><br>I can track eventually where is the trouble, but if someone got the<br>same, we can discuss about it...<br>If nobody got it, maybe someone has an idea of the reason it fails...
<br><br><br>Regards,<br><br>Tristan Mahé<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 6<br>Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 12:07:24 +0000<br>From: "peter ellis" <<a href="mailto:petermarkellis@googlemail.com">
petermarkellis@googlemail.com</a>><br>Subject: [asterisk-dev] Performing an attended transfer<br>To: <a href="mailto:asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com">asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:470f7e2d0612040407t4e2a88a8ra608bf86373d53ec@mail.gmail.com">
470f7e2d0612040407t4e2a88a8ra608bf86373d53ec@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>Hi Guys<br><br>I need to perform an"Attended Transfer" via asterisk where I can
<br>utilise the phones themselves to perform the workload. If i use the -t<br>flag to perform a transfer then I am increasing the work load that<br>asterisk has to perform but not only that the major issue is that the<br>
bandwidth as it doubles when attempting to handle the transferring of<br>calls (this is obviously a limitation for us as the number of<br>concurrent calls drops as this operation sucks bandwidth when talking<br>to asterisk to perform the transfer).
<br>I assume this is so that asterisk can pick up the DTMF tones!???<br>Anyway in the ideal world i simply want the transferring phone to say<br>"asterisk whats the ip of the phone im trying to transfer to...."<br>
asterisk tells the phone and the phone performs the rest of the<br>transfer operation.<br><br>I have located solutions for this online with answers including....use<br>meet me rooms or parked calls.<br><br>However neither of the above solve my issue and both are still heavy
<br>weight operations ...and again i loose bandwidth.<br><br>I guess i simply want to simulate how my aastra 480i performs a xfer<br>...thats it when i press the xfer button..... then this is ok its just<br>the way asterisk does it.
<br><br>We have discussed manipulated the SIP Headers but this is a very last<br>option for us.<br><br>Any help in this matter is greatly appreciated... i know a lot of<br>developers have been asking about this functionality!
<br><br>If you need any other information about this problem from me or extra<br>clarification then please feel free to email me back.<br><br>Kind Regards<br><br>Peter<br><br>p.s. here is an example of someone else asking something similar...
<br><br><a href="http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2005-October/015983.html">http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2005-October/015983.html</a><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 7
<br>Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:57:40 +0100<br>From: Corrado Santoro <<a href="mailto:csanto@diit.unict.it">csanto@diit.unict.it</a>><br>Subject: [asterisk-dev] Creating an audio frame<br>To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <
<a href="mailto:asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com">asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:45742954.9050306@diit.unict.it">45742954.9050306@diit.unict.it</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
<br><br>Hi all,<br><br>I'm writing a gateway application with asterisk and I need to get an<br>audio frame from a proprietary device and route it to an asterisk<br>channel. My question is if there exists a function to create an
<br>"ast_frame", so that I can use then "ast_write".<br><br>Thanks in advance.<br><br>All the best,<br>--Corrado<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 8<br>Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:28:34 -0500
<br>From: "Di-Shi Sun" <<a href="mailto:di-shi@transnexus.com">di-shi@transnexus.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] extend IAX2 IE proposal<br>To: <<a href="mailto:asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com">asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com
</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:006b01c717b8$dcb6d760$110410ac@transnexus.com">006b01c717b8$dcb6d760$110410ac@transnexus.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Hi All,<br>
<br>Thank you for the advices and comments about this issue.<br><br>Our goal is to carry a string longer than 256 bytes in and only in a NEW message. So, using another frame type does not work for our case. In fact, the remote variables patch that Corydon76 posted works for our case very well excpet we have to split our string into several shorter strings. We had used it for a while.
<br><br>Since some other issues, we got a suggestion that to propose and implement a set specific IEs for our purpose. Kevin mentioned that IAX doesn't support multiple instances of the same IE type in a message. We agree with Russell and Markku, repetition is useful. But we do not want to cause any problem no matter in spec or implementation. So we will propose multiple specific IE types for every part of our string.
<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Di-Shi Sun.<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <a href="http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20061204/5707e763/attachment-0001.htm">
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20061204/5707e763/attachment-0001.htm</a><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 9<br>Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 18:32:23 +0200<br>From: Tzafrir Cohen <
<a href="mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com">tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com</a>><br>Subject: [asterisk-dev] bug 8501 [was: compilation problems with linux<br> 2.6.19]<br>To: Asterisk Developers list <<a href="mailto:asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com">
asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20061204163223.GX10512@xorcom.com">20061204163223.GX10512@xorcom.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br><br>Hi<br><br>I'd appreciate a "second opinion" regarding
<br><a href="http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8501">http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8501</a> .<br><br>I'm obviously missing something there<br><br>----- Forwarded message from Tzafrir Cohen <<a href="mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com">
tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com</a>> -----<br><br>Envelope-to: <a href="mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com">tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com</a><br>Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:52:54 -0500<br>Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:49:33 +0200<br>
From: Tzafrir Cohen <<a href="mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com">tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com</a>><br>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <<a href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
</a>><br>Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel compilation problems with linux 2.6.19<br>Mail-Followup-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <<a href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
</a>><br>Organization: Xorcom*<br>Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <<a href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com</a>><br><br>On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:19:14PM +0200, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
<br>> Hello!<br>><br>> I have problems compiling zaptel (tried 1.2.11, 1.2.10 and 1.4.0-beta2 -- all<br>> give the same error) with 2.6.19 kernel<br>><br>> CC [M] /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2
/xpp/card_fxo.o<br>> In file included<br>> from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/xpd.h:26,<br>> from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/card_fxo.c:28:<br>> /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-
1.4.0-beta2/xpp/xdefs.h:93: error:<br>> conflicting types for 'bool'<br>> include/linux/types.h:36: error: previous declaration of 'bool' was here<br>> In file included<br>> from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-
1.4.0-beta2/zconfig.h:9,<br>> from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/zaptel.h:34,<br>> from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/xproto.h:29,<br>> from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-
1.4.0-beta2/xpp/xpd.h:27,<br>> from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/card_fxo.c:28:<br>> include/linux/config.h:10:3: warning: no newline at end of file<br>> make[3]: *** [/home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-
1.4.0-beta2/xpp/card_fxo.o]<br>> Error 1<br>> make[2]: *** [/home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp] Error 2<br>> make[1]: *** [_module_/home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2] Error 2<br>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/roman/install/kernel/linux-
2.6.19'<br>> make: *** [linux26] Error 2<br>><br>> seems that commenting out "typedef int bool;" in xpp/xdefs.h on line 93 works<br>> that out, but don't know if it's completely right thing to do<br>
<br>Simply replacing that int with a _Bool will give several "incompatible<br>pointer type" warnings. The following is from our internal working copy,<br>with pathes removed for clarity:<br><br>CC [M] xpp/card_fxo.o
<br>xpp/card_fxo.c: In function `__check_report_battery':<br>xpp/card_fxo.c:38: warning: return from incompatible pointer type<br>CC [M] xpp/card_fxs.o<br>xpp/card_fxs.c: In function `__check_poll_digital_inputs':<br>xpp/card_fxs.c:37: warning: return from incompatible pointer type
<br>CC [M] xpp/xbus-core.o<br>CC [M] xpp/xpp_zap.o<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c: In function `__check_zap_autoreg':<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c:67: warning: return from incompatible pointer type<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c: In function `__check_prefmaster':
<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c:68: warning: return from incompatible pointer type<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c: In function `__check_xpp_ec':<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c:70: warning: return from incompatible pointer type<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c: In function `xpd_read_proc':
<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c:437: warning: unused variable `chans'<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c: In function `proc_sync_write':<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c:748: warning: int format, bool arg (arg 5)<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c: In function `proc_xpd_ztregister_write':
<br>xpp/xpp_zap.c:816: warning: int format, bool arg (arg 3)<br><br>Most of them seem to be related to the procfs interface. If you don't<br>need xpp for yourself and can leave with those warnings, go ahead.<br><br>I'll try to resolve them.
<br><br>----- End forwarded message -----<br><br>--<br> Tzafrir Cohen<br>icq#16849755 <a href="mailto:jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org">jabber:tzafrir@jabber.org</a><br>+972-50-7952406 mailto:
<a href="mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com">tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com</a><br><a href="http://www.xorcom.com">http://www.xorcom.com</a> <a href="http://iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir">iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir</a>
<br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by <a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br><br>asterisk-dev mailing list
<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev</a><br><br><br>End of asterisk-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 8
<br>*******************************************<br></blockquote></div><br>