<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.8.2">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Why not standard To: field format? Something like<BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">1234 => 4567, Joe Bloggs, <A HREF="mailto:joe@example.com">"joe@example.com</A><A HREF="mailto:joe.bloggs@example.com">,joe.bloggs@example.com"</A></FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 12:07 +0100, Alistair Cunningham wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">>> 1234 => 4567, Joe Bloggs, <A HREF="mailto:joe@example.com">joe@example.com</A> <A HREF="mailto:joe.bloggs@example.com">joe.bloggs@example.com</A></FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> </FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> Now I wonder what scripts will be broken by this syntax. The most</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> obvious separater (,) can't be used. I figure that ';' or ':' are better</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#737373">> candidates.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#000000">Either of these would be fine. We can have our web interface modify the </FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#000000">user's input before writing to the realtime database. Which would people </FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#000000"> prefer? : is the standard separator for Unix variable such as $PATH, </FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#000000">so this seems sensible. We can do both if desired.</FONT></TT><BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>