<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>Message: 8<br>Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:35:25 -0700<br>From: jason justman <<a href="mailto:jason@jasonjustman.com">
jason@jasonjustman.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] chan_skinny - SCOigo is now TROLLING<br>To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <<a href="mailto:asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com">asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com</a>
><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4434705D.6090409@jasonjustman.com">4434705D.6090409@jasonjustman.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br><br>Jeremy McNamara wrote:<br>> jason justman wrote:
<br>><br>>> thats for the operator attendant, not a station<br>><br>> Okay, that still shows that the SCCP protocol deals with the busy<br>> lamp, prior to chan_sccp's implementation.<br>><br>no that shows that cisco's web interface deals with the busy lamp - not
<br>the stations which are running SCCP. unless you think web browsers are<br>now capable communicating over http, https, and perhaps SCCP? that'd be<br>amazing.<br><br></blockquote></div><br>Not that I really want to get embroiled in this- but speaking as one who actually *owns* CCM (and has from
3.3 up to now)- Attendant Console is *NOT* a Web application. It's partially Java based, and uses the cisco TAPI interface to directly control a 79XX series phone. I can't say I've investigated the actual protocol it uses- *BUT*, I have had shared line appearances on my CCM attached 7960 for the last 3 years (
3.3.1 up to 4.0.1) - and it has absolutely indicated status of the shared line- 'hints', in current parlance. So yes, SCCP has supported busy indication for some time now. I'd stand witness to it- but the technical documentation no doubt exists on it- even if Jeremy's reference might be off.
<br><br>-pbd<br>