<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=us-ascii" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Rod Dorman wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid1036939704.20060306173516@polylogics.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Monday, March 6, 2006, 16:51:31, Steve Kann wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> ...
I don't know if the spec should include this as a requirement or not:
It was really a workaround for a broken implementation
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
IMHO a broken implementation is equivalent to a different protocol. A
spec should describe how to do it right, not enumerate several ways to
do it wrong.
At least not in a normative section, a non-normative appendix would be
the appropriate way to incorporate it in the spec if its really needed.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<blockquote cite="mid1036939704.20060306173516@polylogics.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-- but it would still be needed for asterisk < 1.2, or very old
iaxclient implementations (the new jitterbuffer was in iaxclient
before asterisk).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I'm not familiar enough with IAX history. Were the older implementations
IAX Version 2?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, IAX1 and IAX2 are similar in spirit, but completely
non-interoperable. IAX2 was introduced long before asterisk 1.0.<br>
<br>
-SteveK<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>