<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.3.2">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
That makes sense. Thanks.<BR>
<BR>
Bryan<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 18:56 -0600, Steven Critchfield wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 15:03 -0700, Bryan Elliot wrote:</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> Unless I am mistaken (which is very possible), it seems like the</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> Asterisk ChangeLog file in today's HEAD is a bit hosed. I am looking</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> at the ChangeLog from 1.0.5 as a comparison and it seems more</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> complete.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">You must assume then that there is a person maintaining the Changelog</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">file in HEAD. That would be mostly incorrect. The HEAD branch is</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">documented primarily via the cvs logs. You can get a list of changes and</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">their comments via the cvs log command. Many times the comment is a bug</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">number from bugs.digium.com that is being addressed. </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">So, no the file isn't hosed in the least bit, just not maintained.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> </FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>