[asterisk-dev] CLA Update (Requires Resigning)

[Joshua C. Colp]

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 5:37 AM Henning Westerholt <hw at gilawa.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> thanks for the update, the old patent phrase was indeed quite broad,
> noticed that during review. This should capture the intent better.
>
> I understand that it needs re-signing. Does this also mean that the old
> CLA is now voided for all organisations/people that signed it previously
> from a contractual point of view?
>

No, it is not voided.


>
>
> Just a suggestion, maybe it would be advantageous in case of future major
> changes to the CLA to have a quick review session with the community
> before, like on this list. Just as a chance to save the different involved
> parties some time and effort.
>

I'll take this into consideration if it occurs.

If there are ever concerns regarding the CLA as it stands, send me an email
and I can loop in the appropriate party from Sangoma legal to discuss.

-- 
Joshua C. Colp
Asterisk Project Lead
Sangoma Technologies
Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20230612/6c366843/attachment.html>