[asterisk-dev] The CI/CD pipeline on Jenkins

Joshua C. Colp jcolp at sangoma.com
Sat May 14 14:54:55 CDT 2022


On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 2:04 PM Philip Prindeville <
philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was trying to figure out why builds on my laptop on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and
> Openssl 1.1.1f and 3.0 both succeed, but CI/CD is failing.
>
> OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips  26 Jan 2017
>
> NAME="CentOS Linux"
> VERSION="7 (Core)"
> ID="centos"
> ID_LIKE="rhel fedora"
> VERSION_ID="7"
> PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)"
> ANSI_COLOR="0;31"
> CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7"
> HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/"
> BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/"
> CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7"
> CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7"
> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos"
> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7"
>
> Why are we building against an EOL version of CentOS and an equally old
> version of Openssl 1.0.x?
>

CentOS 7 is still widely used and is something we're supporting. It's the
oldest distro I think really that we're still supporting, which is why
CI/CD uses it.


>
> Can we update the CI/CD recipe to something more current?  Like CentOS 8.5?
>

Update? No. Add in addition? Possibly, but I don't want to sink time into
it at this point because we're planning to move away from our current
environment and usage (not for a few months, email and wiki page coming in
the future).

-- 
Joshua C. Colp
Asterisk Technical Lead
Sangoma Technologies
Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20220514/e05dddcc/attachment.html>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list