[asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

[BJ Weschke]

I’m in favor of this approach as well. 


On October 1, 2020 at 10:23:30 AM, Jared Smith (jaredsmith at jaredsmith.net) wrote:

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:04 AM Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com> wrote:
Not really, and I think part of the problem is that this entire thing hasn't really been documented, communicated, or been a strict part of the release or development process. It's been more organic. Going forward it would be explicitly part of the steps when cutting the new branch, for example, and part of the announcement.

OK, thanks for the clarification.  Consider me in favor of the process as you outlined it, and also in favor of a more aggressive stance on deprecation of modules that obviously aren't being heavily used/maintained.  

-Jared
--  
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20201001/ceb1e8f4/attachment.html>