[asterisk-dev] Module Deprecation, Default Not Building, and Removal

[Jared Smith]

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:04 AM Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com> wrote:

> Not really, and I think part of the problem is that this entire thing
> hasn't really been documented, communicated, or been a strict part of the
> release or development process. It's been more organic. Going forward it
> would be explicitly part of the steps when cutting the new branch, for
> example, and part of the announcement.
>

OK, thanks for the clarification.  Consider me in favor of the process as
you outlined it, and also in favor of a more aggressive stance on
deprecation of modules that obviously aren't being heavily used/maintained.

-Jared
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20201001/535632b5/attachment.html>