[asterisk-dev] Advanced Codec Negotiation: Need info and uses cases

[George Joseph]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:03 PM Stefan Tichy <asterisk3 at pi4tel.de> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 08:20:47AM +0200, Michael Maier wrote:
>
> > Transcoding only if there is an allowed and supported codec on both sides
> > which are not common. If there is one common codec on both sides - use
> > this codec and do not transcode.
>
> If Alice (OpenStage20, Local Net) offers G.722, alaw and ulaw and
> Bob (Remote Localtion) supports Opus, alaw and ulaw, then
> transcoding between G.722 and Opus results in better audio quality.
> Transcoding causes some CPU Load, but this might be acceptable.
>
>
Hmmm.  I'll have to think if we can support this generically.
It'd need an option like
"use_the_highest_bitrate_codec_even_if_it_means_transcoding" :)





>
> Kind regards
>
> --
> Stefan Tichy  ( asterisk3 at pi4tel dot de )
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev



-- 
George Joseph
Asterisk Software Developer
direct/fax +1 256 428 6012
Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org
[image: image.png]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20200625/1062381e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5142 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20200625/1062381e/attachment-0001.png>