[asterisk-dev] Difference between ConfBridge and Bridge

[Mohit Dhiman]

ok, thanks Joshua. this really helps.

On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 17:09, Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018, at 4:30 AM, Mohit Dhiman wrote:
> > Hi,
> > As much as i know about Bridge application (in features.c) it uses
> > masquerading to clone a channel's state to a new channel in current
> > thread for bridging two channels.
> > so can anyone tell me how ConfBridge is different from Bridge and does
> > it also uses masquerading and if it does then is it the same process as
> > it is in case of Bridge?
>
> It does not need to steal or move a channel around so it does not use
> masquerading, the act of placing it in the bridge by ConfBridge occurs on
> the thread it is executed on. The same applies to the Dial application
> which uses a bridge underneath.
>
> --
> Joshua C. Colp
> Digium - A Sangoma Company | Senior Software Developer
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
> Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20181227/54b1e7e9/attachment.html>