[asterisk-dev] Park patch to silence slot number

[David Cunningham]

Hi Byrant,

Thank you for the reply (and voicemail). Are you referring to the patch by
Igor Goncharovsky? We had issues because it requires a different context
for each overlapping parking slot, and our multi-tenant environment doesn't
use a different context per tenant. What he said is below. However, we've
just noticed that Asterisk 13 has an 's' option on the Park command to
silence the slot number, so sorry for the trouble!

"It is the how parking works in core of asterisk. When call parked,
asterisk automatically put extensions for call park and for taking a call
from park. I.e. when you want to park two calls at same extension and same
context asterisk unable to do it, because unable to insert second time same
extension in dialplan. I see no problem in using different extensions range
for all parking lots in same context of using different contexts for all
users"


On 3 October 2017 at 16:23, Bryant Zimmerman <BryantZ at zktech.com> wrote:

> You don't need a patch this is possible with the current tools if you keep
> track of parks pickups and ring backs. We use the current system to do
> dynamic parks all of the time in multi tenant environment . We create
> dynamic lots per tenant and address them per sub account. This allows for
> each tenent to have parking slots with any number even when others use the
> same.  I paid part of the bounty to get the original dynamic parking system
> working.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Windows 10 phone
>
>
>
> *From: *David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com>
> *Sent: *Monday, October 2, 2017 11:09 PM
> *To: *asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
> *Subject: *[asterisk-dev] Park patch to silence slot number
>
>
> Hello,
>
> We'd like to get a patch written for Asterisk's Park command, so that with
> a given option it won't play the parking slot number. The idea is that we
> can allow multiple calls to be parked on the same apparent slot number by
> playing the apparent slot number ourselves, and parking calls on a
> different actual slot number. For example we'd play 701 but actually park
> the call on 123701.
>
> Does anyone know of someone who'd be willing to write this patch, and
> submit it for inclusion in Asterisk? We will of course pay a bounty. If I'm
> asking in the wrong place then apologies and please let me know the right
> one.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> --
> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
> http://voisonics.com/
> USA: +1 213 221 1092 <+1%20213-221-1092>
> Australia: +61 (0) 2 8063 9019 <+61%202%208063%209019>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>



-- 
David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
http://voisonics.com/
USA: +1 213 221 1092
Australia: +61 (0) 2 8063 9019
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20171004/ade827f7/attachment.html>