[asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

[Matthew Jordan]

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Matt Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 10:43 AM, George Joseph wrote:
> >> We just discovered that the PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command really
> >> only dumps all aors regardless of whether there's an inbound
> registration
> >> associated with it or not.  Fixing this would mean a change to what this
> >> command returns so I'm trying to get some feedback.  There are 2
> solution
> >> alternatives...
> >>
> >> 1.  We could replace the current InboundRegistrationDetail event (which
> >> isn't even registered) with a ContactStatusDetail event.  Obviously this
> >> is
> >> a change for anyone who uses this command.
> >>
> >> 2.  We could send a ContactStatusDetail event along with the existing
> >> InboundRegistrationDetail event.  This would double the number of events
> >> sent and therefore increase the total data sent.
> >>
> >> Honestly I'm not sure how this command was ever useful to anybody so I'm
> >> leaning towards option 1 but we need feedback.
> >>
> >> This would be a change to 13, 14 and master.
> >
> > Since it was not really useful I'm okay with 1.
>
> Just as something to consider:
>
> If we make breaking changes to AMI, this would require a major number
> version bump, right?
>
>
Yes, it would.

-- 
Matthew Jordan
Digium, Inc. | CTO
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20161207/b21e9119/attachment-0001.html>