[asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

[George Joseph]

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Dan Jenkins <dan.jenkins88 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>> I'd go with Option 1 - although it feels wrong breaking something
> (regardless as to whether it was already broken) within a minor/patch
> release.
>
> In theory people should be reading release notes but I fall foul of not
> reading release notes for breakages within a minor/patch update - because
> in theory it shouldn't break anything... But we all know this does indeed
> happen. I would argue the current behaviour is broken and so you are fixing
> the broken behaviour - if people are relying on the data in this command
> then they're relying on incorrect data anyway.
>

I like your reasoning.


>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>



-- 
George Joseph
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20161206/1912ca5a/attachment.html>