[asterisk-dev] Journald support for Asterisk

Bruce Ferrell bferrell at baywinds.org
Sun May 10 13:46:01 CDT 2015


On 05/09/2015 01:53 PM, Ludovic Gasc wrote:
> 2015-05-09 16:15 GMT+02:00 Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at baywinds.org <mailto:bferrell at baywinds.org>>:
>
>     On 05/09/2015 01:17 AM, Ludovic Gasc wrote:
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > Systemd and Journald is now by default on Debian Jessie and Ubuntu 15.04, as on RHEL/CentOS.
>     > Journald supports syslog format, nevertheless, at least for us, the structured log system provided with journald helps us to debug the production.
>     >
>     > The idea behind that is to attach metadata with a log line to facilitate the search with journalctl, you can write queries to find the errors.
>     >
>     > For example, with Apache: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_journald.html
>     >
>     > For our Python daemons, for each log line, we store account_id, request_id, endpoint and method used to be easy to retrieve quickly interesting logs.
>     >
>     > Moreover, not yet used for us, but you can generate statistics about your source code real usage based
>     > on: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.journal-fields.html#CODE_FILE=
>     >
>     > For Asterisk, for example with dialplan logging, you should attach the context, the extension and the channel.
>     >
>     > You can simulate this journald feature with a specific format message for your logs, nevertheless, journalctl is more user-friendly to retrieve pertinent logs compare to the
>     > classical grep usage.
>     > ave no idea if i
>     > I'm permitted to raise the question about an eventual journald support in Asterisk because I don't find anything about that in issues tracker nor mailing list.
>     >
>     > Moreover, I understand that even if you add the journald support, it's certainly necessary to change logging everywhere in Asterisk, however, I should help to do that.
>     >
>     > Regards
>     > --
>     > Ludovic Gasc (GMLudo)
>     > http://www.gmludo.eu/
>     >
>     >
>     systemd and journald SUCK to high heaven.
>
>
> I've no problems to believe you, nevertheless, could you be more precise ?
> What are the facts that you arrive to this conclusion ?
>  
>
>       I have no idea if the issues I've had with them (OpenSUSE) are distro related or inherent.
>
>
> It's issues on your production with several servers ? Or on your laptop ?
> Could give us links with unresolved bugs you have ?
> For now, to my experience, with 6 VMs on Debian Jessie on production with small clients and Asterisk 13, I've no issues with systemd nor journald.
>  
>
>     I have seen that the implementation of apache with a static systemd/journald module will no longer correctly serve content.
>
>
> Could you give me a link about that ?
I would suggest you try it for yourself.  Procedure to reproduce:

Perform fresh install of OpenSUSE 13.2
assure apache/php/MySQL support are installed
install wordpress from wordpress.org
Observe CSS is NOT correctly served.

I did this several times to assure my findings.

I rebuilt the opensuse rpms from the source rpms to omit systemd/journald from the apache build.  Correct operation was now observed

The response to the bug report was "Use Nginex"

>     Please do NOT do this
>

> Why ? If it works for me, what's the problem for you ?

  Systemd integration has been insidious.  Should you wish to discuss further, please off this list.

>  
>
>       It also breaks fail2ban site security.  
>
>
> I don't understand the issue here, I see at least two solutions:
> 1. You can continue to use rsyslog even if you have journald, BTW, it's the default setup of Debian Jessie, where journald forwards everything to rsyslog to avoid to perturb
> sysadmins with log files.
> 2. Apparently, fail2ban supports journald: https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/pull/82

1.) I don't know of any asterisk systems that use any form of system logging.  It can, and the fact that you keep bringing syslog logging into this indicates a lack of
understanding of asterisk usage on your part.
2.) Not released code and still under test.  This is disingenuous, at best.
3.) Just because everyone else is jumping off of bridges isn't a good enough reason to do it.  It's NOT broken and this is NOT an improvement.

>  
>
>     Asterisk works well now.  It integrates easily.
>
>
> For this point, I'm agree with you, it's very important to continue to be integrated easily, I use that a lot.
>  
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     _____________________________________________________________________
>     -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
>     asterisk-dev mailing list
>     To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>        http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
>
>
>




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list