[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4490: astdb: Allow clustering of the Asterisk Database between multiple Asterisk servers
rmudgett
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed Mar 25 17:26:00 CDT 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#review14836
-----------------------------------------------------------
/trunk/funcs/func_db.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25431>
typo: Asterisk
/trunk/include/asterisk/astdb.h
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25432>
Doxygen comment:
/*!
/trunk/main/db.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25433>
Use AO2_ALLOC_OPT_LOCK_NOLOCK
OBJ_NOLOCK is not an alloc option.
/trunk/main/db.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25435>
Use the current ao2 sort template for the function.
This function is using the old define names.
/trunk/main/db.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25436>
Is clone ref leaked here?
/trunk/main/db.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25437>
Is clone ref leaked here?
/trunk/main/db.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25443>
Use OBJ_SEARCH_KEY instead
/trunk/res/res_pjsip_publish_asterisk.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25444>
Call unload_module()?
/trunk/res/res_pjsip_publish_asterisk.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25445>
Call unload_module()?
/trunk/res/res_pjsip_publish_asterisk.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/#comment25446>
I'm not sure why the pattern is:
load_module() {}
unload_module() {}
When a failing load_module() usually calls unload_module() to cleanup.
- rmudgett
On March 25, 2015, 10:35 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated March 25, 2015, 10:35 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
>
>
> Bugs: ASTERISK-24909
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24909
>
>
> Repository: Asterisk
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> As described on the asterisk-dev mailing list [1], I got some inspiration from seeing Kamailio's htable implementation, and thought a similar mechanism would work for the Asterisk Database. This patch is the result.
>
> This patch provides a mechanism to mark families within the AstDB as "shared." The marking of a family as shared is independent of the existance of the family, and is independent of the updates already made to the family. Shared families are subject to distribution with other Asterisk instances, as well as subject to updates from other Asterisk instances. Two strategies for sharing are implemented:
>
> * Global: A 'global' shared family shares the family/key space with all other Asterisk instances. Say we have shared family 'foo', and we have two Asterisk instances. Say the first Asterisk instance (ast1) updates a key in family 'foo' to the following:
>
> ast1
> /foo/key = bar
>
> The second Asterisk instance (ast2) would then receive an update in its AstDB:
>
> ast2
> /foo/key = bar
>
> If ast2 later updates the same key in its local AstDB to 'foobar', ast1 will receive a notification to update the same key in its AstDB:
>
> ast2
> /foo/key = foobar
> ast1
> /foo/key = foobar
>
> * Unique: A 'unique' shared family shares its values with other Asterisk instances, however, updates from other Asterisk instances are placed in unique families in the local AstDB for each Asterisk instance. Again, say we have shared family 'foo', and we have two Asterisk instances - ast1 and ast2. ast1 has an EID of 11:11:11:11:11:11, while ast2 has an EID of ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff. Say ast1 updates a key in family 'foo':
>
> ast1
> /foo/key = bar
>
> ast2 would receive the update for family 'foo', but instead of updating its local copy, it would instead store the value in a new family for ast1 corresponding to its EID:
>
> ast2
> /11:11:11:11:11:11/foo/key = bar
>
> If ast2 later updates the same ky in its local AstDB to 'foobar', the received value from ast1 will not be updated. However, ast1 will receive the update, and store the value in a new family for ast2 corresponding to its EID:
>
> ast2
> /foo/key = foobar
> /11:11:11:11:11:11/foo/key = bar
> ast1
> /foo/key = bar
> /ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff/foo/key = foobar
>
> In order to manipulate shared families, two new dialplan functions have been added, DB_SHARED and DB_SHARED_EXISTS. DB_SHARED allows for creation of a shared family, as well as deletion, while DB_SHARED_EXISTS returns whether or not a family is shared:
> same => n,Set(DB_SHARED(put,global)=foo) ; share family 'foo' globally
> same => n,Set(DB_SHARED(put,unique)=foobar) ; share family 'foobar' uniquely
> same => n,NoOp(${DB_SHARED_EXISTS(foo)}) ; returns '1'
> same => n,Set(DB_SHARED(delete)=foo) ; remove shared family status for 'foo'
>
> CLI commands were also added to create/delete shared families, and the output of 'database show|showkey' updated to show the shared status of a family/key/value tuple.
>
> Finally, a mechanism for sharing AstDB information was added to the PJSIP stack's res_pjsip_publish_asterisk. This includes a new event type, 'asterisk-db', which contains the values being created/deleted. Necessary configuration parameters were added to the existing configuration objects that support inbound/outbound PUBLISH support. An example of a PUBLISH request with the new event type is shown below:
>
> PUBLISH sip:ast1 at 127.0.0.1:5061 SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj1eb182a7-a0aa-4d73-995d-d2ad4b096db2
> From: <sip:ast1 at 127.0.0.1>;tag=7b294642-06ae-4ecf-8637-db8ba2dc4397
> To: <sip:ast1 at 127.0.0.1>
> Call-ID: b9463adc-e364-440d-8ce1-842372813b08
> CSeq: 48111 PUBLISH
> Event: asterisk-db
> Expires: 3600
> Max-Forwards: 70
> User-Agent: Asterisk PBX SVN-mjordan-trunk-astdb-cluster-URL:-r432916M-/trunk
> Content-Type: application/json
> Content-Length: 156
>
> {"type":"dbstate","eid":"11:11:11:11:11:11","dbstate":{"verb":"put","family":"global_shared","share_type":"global","entries":[{"data":"foo","key":"key1"}]}}
>
>
> As a note on the power of the frameworks in Asterisk 13 - in this case, both Stasis and PJSIP - the vast bulk of this was written on two plane flights, plus a weekend or so of test writing and cleanup.
>
> [1] http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2015-March/073192.html
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/tests/test_db.c 432914
> /trunk/res/res_pjsip_pubsub.c 432914
> /trunk/res/res_pjsip_publish_asterisk.c 432914
> /trunk/res/res_pjsip_outbound_publish.c 432914
> /trunk/main/utils.c 432914
> /trunk/main/db.c 432914
> /trunk/include/asterisk/utils.h 432914
> /trunk/include/asterisk/astdb.h 432914
> /trunk/funcs/func_db.c 432914
> /trunk/configs/samples/pjsip.conf.sample 432914
> /trunk/CHANGES 432914
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4490/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Existing AstDB tests execute successfully, as do the existing PJSIP PUBLISH tests. In addition:
>
> * Unit tests were written (included in this review) that verify the API additions to the AstDB. This includes:
> - Verification of creation/delation of shared families
> - Verification that creating/deleting an AstDB entry in a shared family publishes the correct Stasis message
> - Verification that all keys/values in all shared families can be published via a 'refresh'
>
> * Asterisk Test Suite tests for the PJSIP PUBLISH distribution of the AstDB information are available at: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4508/
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Jordan
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20150325/d42d26fa/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list