[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4489: res_pjsip: allow configuration of endpoint identifier query order

[Kevin Harwell]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4489/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated March 17, 2015, 1:20 p.m.)


Status
------

This change has been marked as submitted.


Review request for Asterisk Developers.


Changes
-------

Committed in revision 433028


Bugs: ASTERISK-24840
    https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24840


Repository: Asterisk


Description
-------

Make sure that no matter what order the endpoint identifier modules were loaded, priority is given based on the ones specified in the new global 'endpoint_identifier_order' option.

The original patch for this issue had to be reverted due to some problems it created (original review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4455/).

However, those problems have now been alleviated with the current patch on this review. Instead of having the associated endpoint identifier name directly contained on the identifier object (part of the externally exposed struct definition) the name is now passed in as part of the register function. The old register function has been left for backwards compatibility or for any modules that don't need to register with a name.


Diffs
-----

  branches/13/res/res_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_user.c 432869 
  branches/13/res/res_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_ip.c 432869 
  branches/13/res/res_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_anonymous.c 432869 
  branches/13/res/res_pjsip/config_global.c 432869 
  branches/13/res/res_pjsip.c 432869 
  branches/13/include/asterisk/res_pjsip.h 432869 
  branches/13/contrib/ast-db-manage/config/versions/45e3f47c6c44_add_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_order.py 432869 
  branches/13/configs/samples/pjsip.conf.sample 432869 
  branches/13/CHANGES 432869 

Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4489/diff/


Testing
-------

Ran the testsuite test and it still passed. Modified the test by changing the order of the identifiers and it failed (as it should have).


Thanks,

Kevin Harwell

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20150317/4f98fbd3/attachment.html>