[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4374: Asterisk: For httpd server, need option to define server name for security purposes
Ashley Sanders
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed Jan 28 15:30:47 CST 2015
> On Jan. 27, 2015, 7:48 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
> > ./branches/13/main/http.c, line 640
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4374/diff/1-2/?file=71085#file71085line640>
> >
> > This seems kind of small for the amount that could be put in here. May want to switch to using an ast_str for this and use ast_str_set_va() instead of the snprintf() when filling the string.
>
> Ashley Sanders wrote:
> You are correct, this is a small amount. From the previous review, you advised to take the larger of the error/auth functions' header size and use that, which, admittedly, was different from this = 256. However, thinking about it, that amount even seems small and not very useful.
>
> What size seems reasonably large enough to be useful but small enough to be succinct such as not to create an exception on the other side?
>
> I found this answer from 2010: http://stackoverflow.com/a/3436155
> and this from 2012: http://stackoverflow.com/a/686243
>
>
> rmudgett wrote:
> Use of ast_str variables created by ast_str_create() eliminates any worry about the string being too small. The ast_str functions will add more room if needed when the ast_str is created with ast_str_create().
Okay. This is very helpful information. Thank you.
- Ashley
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4374/#review14324
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 28, 2015, 10:57 a.m., Ashley Sanders wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4374/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 28, 2015, 10:57 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
>
>
> Bugs: ASTERISK-24316
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24316
>
>
> Repository: Asterisk
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Currently, all responses from the Asterisk HTTP server contain a [Server] header that identifies Asterisk and its version (e.g. "Server:Asterisk/<version>", where <version> is the currently running version of Asterisk). The preferred behavior is to allow the user to configure an alternate name to use for the value returned in the [Server] header for HTTP responses (e.g. "Server:SomeSuperAwesomeServerName").
>
> This patch provides a new configuration property, [servername], in http.conf, that gives users the ability to modify the value that Asterisk uses when identifying itself.
>
> By default, the new property is unused, which means that out-of-the-box, the HTTP server behaves just like it did prior to the patch. Requests to the HTTP server will generate responses with the old-style [Server] header (e.g. "Server:Asterisk/<version>", where <version> is the currently running version of Asterisk). To see the new behavior, you must add the configuration property, [servername] with some value (an empty value will work, also) to http.conf.
>
> Whatever value the HTTP server is holding for the server name can now be seen through the httpstatus web page (http://<bindaddr>:<bindport>/<prefix>/httpstatus) (where [bindaddr], [bindport], and [prefix] are all values configured in http.conf) and the CLI command: http show status.
>
> ***Note*** This is just the patch to the Asterisk source. You can find the review for the Testsuite at: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4377/
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> ./branches/13/main/http.c 431112
> ./branches/13/include/asterisk/http.h 431112
> ./branches/13/configs/samples/http.conf.sample 431112
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4374/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ashley Sanders
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20150128/26ab0586/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list