[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4335: res_pjsip_multihomed: Test to ensure correct message contents when multiple transports exist

Matt Jordan reviewboard at asterisk.org
Fri Jan 16 17:08:49 CST 2015


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4335/#review14213
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



/asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/incoming_call_on_second_transport/test-config.yaml
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4335/#comment24673>

    This probably needs chan_pjsip, res_pjsip_session, and res_pjsip_multihomed.


- Matt Jordan


On Jan. 13, 2015, 11:36 a.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4335/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 13, 2015, 11:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-24615
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24615
> 
> 
> Repository: testsuite
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This test configures res_pjsip with 3 UDP transports and sends a call into Asterisk on the second transport. It examines the 200 OK response upon answer to ensure the Contact header is that of the second transport.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/tests.yaml 6267 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/incoming_call_on_second_transport/test-config.yaml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/incoming_call_on_second_transport/sipp/answer.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/incoming_call_on_second_transport/configs/ast1/pjsip.conf PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/incoming_call_on_second_transport/configs/ast1/extensions.conf PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4335/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran it. It passed. Sabotaged it. It failed. Rolled back fix. It failed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joshua Colp
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20150116/884f9ba9/attachment.html>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list