[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4589: res_pjsip_t38: Add missing initialization of udptl->far_max_datagram in t38_initialize_session()

[Juergen Spies]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4589/#review15177
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Juergen Spies


On April 10, 2015, 8:49 a.m., Juergen Spies wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4589/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 10, 2015, 8:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-24928
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24928
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Initialize "udptl->far_max_datagram" in t38_initialize_session() with a default value or a value provided
> in pjsip.conf (t38_udptl_maxdatagram).
> Without this far_max_datagram remains -1 if the remote endpoint does not provide the MediaAttribute T38FaxMaxDatagram
> in it's SIP INVITE SDP. This will result in the INVITE being rejected.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/13/res/res_pjsip_t38.c 433967 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4589/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I have tested the patch with the following setup. The Asterisk is acting as relay.
> The external T.38 gateway is at our ISP. The internal gateway is a Cisco SPA112.
> The ISP’s gateway does not include T38FaxMaxDatagram in SDPs.
> 
> The test cases included:
> - No t38_udptl_maxdatagram in pjsip.conf
>   o Faxes in both directions with "normal" SDPs (all INVITEs created by Cisco),
>   o Outbound fax w/o T38FaxMaxDatagram in SDP,
> - t38_udptl_maxdatagram defined in pjsip.conf for both endpoints
>   o Faxes in both directions with "normal" SDPs (all INVITEs created by Cisco).
> 
> All tests were completed successfully.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Juergen Spies
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20150410/d85b9901/attachment.html>